SD-Rule Transaction Details: 2015 to 2016
The detail transaction of SD-Rules are described as below:
Computer Generated SD-Rules | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID | Proposed New Rule | Source | Results | Rank & Rule 2015 | Rank & Rule 2016 | Type | Count Change | Accu. Count |
01-CG1 | e$|verb|is$|noun | nomD | Good | 34: ose$|verb|osis$|noun | 27: se$|verb|sis$|noun | Parent-1-Child | +0 | 75* |
02-CG2 | sia$|noun|tic$|adj | orgD | Good | None | 40: sia$|noun|tic$|adj | New in 2016 | +1 | 76 |
03-CG3 | on$|noun|ve$|adj | orgD | Good | None | 48: on$|noun|ve$|adj | New in 2016 | +1 | 77 |
04-CG4 | e$|noun|ic$|adj | orgD | Good | None | 49: e$|noun|ic$|adj | New in 2016 | +1 | 78 |
05-CG5 | $|adj|ism$|noun | nomD | Good | None | 51: $|adj|ism$|noun | New in 2016 | +1 | 79 |
06-CG6 | ation$|noun|ed$|adj | nomD | Good | None | 67: ation$|noun|ed$|adj | New in 2016 | +1 | 80 |
07-CG7 | $|noun|ship$|noun | orgD | Good | None | 70: $|noun|ship$|noun | New in 2016 | +1 | 81 |
08-CG8 | e$|adj|ion$|noun | nomD | Bad | None | 88: e$|adj|ion$|noun | New in 2016 | +0 | 81 |
09-CG9 | $|noun|age$|noun | orgD | Bad | None | 96: $|noun|age$|noun | New in 2016 | +0 | 81 |
10-CG10 | e$|verb|ing$|noun | nomD | Good | 44: e$|verb|ing$|noun | 47: e$|verb|ion$|noun | Duplicate | +0 | 81 |
Expert-Suggested SD-Rules | ||||||||
11-ES1 | esis$|noun|ic$|adj | Experts | Good | None | 13: genesis$|noun|genic$|adj | New in 2016 | +1 | 82 |
12-ES2 | al$|adj|ine$|noun | Experts | Bad | None | 98: al$|adj|ine$|noun | New in 2016 | +0 | 82 |
* 75 out of 76 good SD-Rules in 2015 are evaluated as good rules in 2016. They could be identical, or replaced by the parent-rules or child-rules. Only the least rank (76) from the previous optimal set, ar$|adj|e$|noun
, is evaluated as bad rule in 2016 release.
Type | 2015 | 2016 | Details | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No Change | 74 | 74 | ... | ||||
Good Rule turn bad | 1 | 0 | ar$|adj|e$|noun
| ||||
Parent-1-Child | 1 | 1 |
| ||||
New in 2016 | 0 | 7 |
| ||||
Total | 76 | 82 |
The conclusion is the optimized set of SD-Rules is very steady as we expected. Does this imply that Lexicon is a good representative subset of general English?